Showing posts with label joss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label joss. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

It’s About Power: Dollhouse Follows a Whedon Tradition


The new series Dollhouse is off to a slow start. Many have complained that this really isn’t the Joss Whedon quality we are accustomed to. I wasn’t hot about the first episode, but with each week the show is getting progressively more interesting. Press reports and reviews are hinting that the March 20 (written by Whedon) and other near future episodes are awesome and shouldn’t be missed. If you weren’t watching the show before, now is the time to start.

The program’s protagonist is Echo, who works as and Active (also called a Doll). An Active is a person that can have their personalities wiped and can be imprinted with a new persona and skill set. These Dolls can be hostage negotiators, backup singing bodyguards, master thieves or blind cult members. People come to the Dollhouse if they have a problem and the Active is given the personality and skills to complete some objective. The Actives have voluntarily chosen this lot in life, although there is an element of slavery here, it has a more pronounced prostitution vibe. Echo and the other Dolls are slowly becoming self-aware and start to inch their way out of this mandated conformity.

Dollhouse works on many levels, on the surface you can view the program as procedural—Echo is needed for X, therefore she is programmed for Y to solve X and wackiness ensues. But when you examine it at a more critical angle, you find that it is a story of domination and a powerful institution that can turn you into anything they want you to be.

Other works of Whedon are stories that are often framed from a critical theory perspective. Critical theory is the study of oppressive practices that need to be changed. The examination of power in many forms is just one theme that is evident throughout the Whedonverse.

Many scholars and critics see Buffy the Vampire Slayer as a feminist narrative, as a young woman is underestimated by society and many patriarchal institutions (school, government, military, Watcher’s Council) and yet she is full of inner strength and physical power. Buffy doesn’t fit within these established structures and some of the show’s drama comes from this tension. Although on the surface, she fits the hegemonic notion of what a girl should be (attractive, thin, enjoys shopping and cute boys), Buffy is much more than what is expected. She is not a perfect feminist icon and that is part of what makes her story so compelling.

On Angel, the misuse of legal and corporate power is shown through the institution of Wolfram and Hart. In seasons 1 through 4, Angel fights against the employees and actions of this evil law firm. We learn that Wolfram and Hart is an organization that doesn’t care about people or justice, since they are too busy working on gaining more power. The 5th and final season of Angel, we see him working inside Wolfram and Hart. We see through this storyline that power is seductive and even those with the best intentions can be corrupted through corporations. This is illustrated in surface and metaphorical ways. Characters in the narrative mention that Angel has become a corporate puppet through his role at Wolfram and Hart, later in the season he literally becomes a puppet, with a felt body and a tear away nose. The character of Fred is also a victim to the corporation, as she is hollowed out and becomes a “shell” of the person she once was as she is transformed into the demon, Illyria. The Angel series finale is about battling a big bad institutionally based power structure, even though chances of winning are small. The goal isn’t to win; it is to show the powerful that heroes don’t back down-- they fight.

The series Firefly and the movie Serenity also share this critical theory theme. The Alliance is the most oppressive power in the ‘verse. There was a war and the Browncoats fought against the Alliance, the characters of Mal and Zoe were soldiers fighting for independence. The Browncoats are seen as outsiders and are subjected by the powerful Alliance and are forced out into outer planets or the margins of society. The character of River was used as a subject by unethical Alliance doctors and scientists to mold her into the ultimate weapon; this was all done without her consent. In the movie Serenity, they find out how Reevers (cannibalistic and animalistic people) were created. The people on the planet Miranda were given a drug to make them peaceful, compliant and non-aggressive. This made most of the population super lazy and they eventually just died because they gave up. A tiny segment of the population had the opposite effect to the medication and turned into the ultra violent Reevers. The Alliance denies all knowledge of this and worked hard to cover it up.

One thematic undercurrent of Dr. Horrible’s Sing a Long Blog is making societal changes. All of the main characters strive to make changes in the world, through computer mediated communication (Dr. Horrible/ Billy’s Blog), community activism (Penny’s work with the homeless) and arrogant heroism (Captain Hammer’s good deeds). Dr. Horrible talks a lot about unequal power structures. In one of his first blog post he makes these goals for social change known, “it’s not about making money. It’s about taking money. Destroying the status quo, because the status is not quo. The world is a mess and I just need to rule it.” He also has a distain for the corporate system. In the first act he sings, “all that matters, taking matters into your own hands. Soon I’ll control everything my wish is your command.” He calls Captain Hammer a “corporate tool” as he represents conformity, militarism and traditional forms of masculinity. In a conversation with Penny, Billy tells her about his worldview, “I’m talking about an overhaul of the system. Putting the power in different hands.”

In Dollhouse, the corporate machine molds the Actives into personas that have a functional purpose. The first 5 episode shows a world where everything and anything is for sale. The clients of the Dollhouse pay for their services and the more life threatening the task, the more they can charge for it. Ethics and morals are out the window where people are products, the ultimate sign of corporate greed and human comodification. In the real world, it seems like overly capitalist corporate interests are not the least bit humanistic and the Dollhouse echoes this philosophy. Many of the employees at the Dollhouse have no problem with this as they view the Actives not as people, but as tools to accomplish a task. Laurence Dominic is worried that Adelle DeWitt, the manager of the Dollhouse, likes Echo. That is that some part of her acknowledges Echo’s humanity and that is dangerous. Other characters like Boyd Langton, Echo’s handler/mentor has true affectation for her and desperately cares for her well being.

The concept of Dollhouse can be used to play out some existential dilemmas through a television narrative. Dollhouse brings up some thought provoking ideas about what makes a person a person and shows a dystopian universe where people are transformed into human robots. In the Doll’s non-working states, they are childlike and docile and they can never assert any agency or uniqueness. Anything that is unseemly or problematic is taken out as a measure of control. People are dehumanized when freedom of choice and thought are taken away and shows that even in the harshest dictatorships the soul or strength of the human condition can prevail as the Dolls have shown glimpses of individuality even with this level of repression. The mysterious Alpha, a rouge Active, went into a murderous rage (I think we’ll find more about this on Friday’s episode), but others are showing other signs of defiance (Victor’s feelings towards Sierra and Echo’s unpredictableness during missions).

Even though I haven’t been wowed yet, Dollhouse is an interesting concept that can bring up lots of thought provoking scenarios. I’m waiting to see how this season evolves, before I decide if it is worthy of the Whedon cannon.


Digg!

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Death in the Dollhouse


Waiting to watch the premiere of Dollhouse is full of drama, months before the show is about to air. We get the rumors of production issues and reshoots. Most recently the show was changing time slots to Friday night. It is know as the Fox death slot and it is where Firefly and other good programs died there. People are buzzing across the net that this show doomed before it ever crosses the airwaves. I want to take a half-full approach to these reported problems.

Three reasons to not write its obituary quite yet:

  1. I know of a certain little show that started out in the death slot and lasted 9 seasons. The X-Files began on Fridays and eventually moved out when it gained an audience. I still think that Friday’s are problematic, but it isn’t the end of the world.


  2. Technology has changed. The DVR revolution has changed the way people watch TV. It doesn’t matter if you are busy on Friday night, (my perceived reason why it is the death slot) because the TIVO is home, available to record. I don’t know how this plays with how programs are evaluated, but it may help with the timeslot issue. Secondly, the network has other things to look at in addition to the ratings. Viewings on the web and iTunes downloads are also in play. Something the crazy Whedon fans (like me) will jump all over.


  3. I have faith in Joss Whedon. He is the guy that made a mid season replacement, on a second string network based on a mediocre movie into a critical success and a crazy obsessive cult. I trust him, because of his track record of creative successes. Let’s just hope he has an opportunity to do this thing this time.

Until February 13, I will be tune out negative speculation.


Digg!

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Dr. Horrible Act II & III

Here are a view thoughts, I don’t to linear recaps.

Act Two of Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog is just as good as the first part. Act III broke my heart, something that Joss has done before (Wesley, Tara, Fred, Wash and many others).

Dr. Horrible follows a classic three act structure; this is easy to see when the show is split up into these equal 13 minute parts. The first act sets up the plot and introduces the audience to the characters and the universe they inhabit. Act two is the confrontation. The third part is the resolution and the climax.

I think all three leads are perfect for the parts they play. Neil Patrick Harris, Nathan Fillion and Felicia Day all have pleasant singing voices and their voices fit with the personas of the characters.

Harris as Dr. Horrible/Billy is sweet, jealous and ultimately tragic. At the end of Act Two he gives this wicked smirk that is totally perfect, when he decides killing Captain Hammer will solve all of his problems. He has a lot of pathos in this role and the audience (or at least I) rooted for. The character of Dr. Horrible is full of contractions. He wants Penny to know that he is “a true villain” although she appears to be more turned on by heroics. Dr. Horrible isn’t evil, just misunderstood. He doesn’t want to fight Johnny Snow, because “there are kids in that park.” He wants to get rid of pain (see lyrics to the freeze ray song) and injustice (putting power into different hands). Resorting to vengeance and violence is his downfall. If he would’ve waited Penny might have seen that Captain Hammer is “cheesy on the outside” and inside and would like Billy for Billy.

Captain Hammer is arrogant clueless bastard; he does good, but for all the wrong reasons (ego, fame, and groupies). Fillion plays the part so well that I forgot he was Captain Mal “tightpants” Reynolds on Firefly and for me that is big. I love that he plays the role with bravado, but I really enjoyed how he delivered the line, “the hammer is my penis.” He whispers it to Billy and that makes the whole thing more perverse.

I loved Felicia Day in this. Penny is relatable and cute. She is a perfect pair with Billy, but the Hammer is in the way. When I saw poor Penny waiting for Billy at the laundromat with an extra frozen yogurt, I knew we might not get a happy ending.

After Act II, I wondered what would happen in the finale. Will Dr. Horrible get into the Evil League of Evil? Will Penny dump the Hammer for the Horrible? Does Billy/Dr. Horrible have the balls/skills to take out Captain Hammer? The cute-little superhero musical turned in to a tragic opera.

My favorite part of Act III is seeing the Evil League of Evil. I loved the letter and phone call from Bad Horse and was happy I got to see him in the end. I always pictured him as a horse and not a man with a mustache. I loved the other members of the cabal, especially Fake Thomas Jefferson and Dead Bowie.

The free online is gone. Now download the whole thing on iTunes for only $3.99.




I hope people who were not Whedon fans before join the cult, because of Dr. Horrible.


Digg!

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog



Have you heard of Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog? It is a musical-action-comedy thingy that is making its debut on the web July 15. It looks like it going to be pretty cool, especially if you are a fan of the Once More with Feeling episode of Buffy. It also helps if you always thought Doogie Houser (Neil Patrick Harris) and Captain Mal from Firefly (Nathan Fillion) would make perfect arch-nemeses. And it is Joss Whedon for goodness sakes!

Here is the schedule:
Part 1: Tuesday, July 15
Part 2: Thursday, July 17
Part 3: Saturday, July 19

All three parts will stay up only through July 20, but deals are currently underway to make it available for downloading shortly thereafter.

TV Guide Online has a cool article about it: http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Roush-Dispatch/Joss-Whedon-Dr/800042425

Watch a preview of it below.



Teaser from Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog on Vimeo.

Slayage, Power, Gender Issues. . . .




One of the reasons I started this blog was to “have a chat about TV.” I guess it is going to start out as a monologue, until I get people to start reading it. Last month I attended the Slayage Conference in Arkadelphia Arkansas. This academic conference was about the television programs created by Joss Whedon (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel & Firefly). It was there that I got inspired to start writing about television and popular culture, instead of internalizing all of my thoughts. This blog will also help me curb the desire to have the occasional face-to-face discussion with someone that doesn’t care about the homoerotic subtext in Smallville.


Why I haven’t added to the blog, until recently is that I had an online class that kept me busy writing a lot and I didn’t have the energy to have any additional computer time. The course was titled, Communication and Power. It was a very interesting course and I will use some of that critical theory I learned to add to the discussion here.

Below is an excerpt from a post I made for my online class. It kind of thing fits within my whole, talking about television theme of this blog. The topic of the discussion board post is images of women in the media.

This academic conference was about the television programs Buffy, Angel & Firefly. Many presentations I attended focused on the staging of gender in those TV series. Papers topics included: Girlie Feminism, Violence and the Slayer, the Limitations of Buffy’s Feminism, Hegemony and the Performance of Gender, Buffy & Nancy Drew—Development of Strong Female Role Models in Adolescent Literature, Consumer and Domestic Stereotypes in Buffy, the Damaged Man in Angel, and Gazing at Male Vampires—Bodies as Spectacle.

Here is what I think when using that show as a lens to view media images of women. Power is a huge theme within the Buffy series. Although the Buffy character does fit the little, cute, blonde image that popularized in the media that stereotype is subverted. The character does have extreme physical power and yet she works on keeping her outside appearance girlish and sexualized. Buffy can be strong and yet have power in various aspects of her life. Although that issue is one tiny aspect of the program there are many more issues surrounding gender roles of men and woman on Buffy and its spin-off series Angel. What makes the show especially interesting is that it doesn’t give simple, “afterschool special” life lessons—but forces the audience to think about issues of gender and power in revealing ways. This show creates a dialogue about gender and other societal issues. If you never have seen the show, I suggest you watch it.